Forest Conservation Funding Gap: What Does the 15% Decline in Global Deforestation Mean?

Forests are among the Earth’s most valuable natural resources. Far more than collections of trunks and leaves, they are living communities of plants, animals, fungi, microorganisms, soil and water, bound together by countless relationships that sustain life on Earth.

Yet these vital relationships are facing mounting pressure from expanding road networks, agricultural expansion, commercial activities, mining and unsustainable land use. In the face of this growing crisis, tree plantation and forest restoration have become essential priorities. Planting trees can help restore degraded landscapes, rebuild wildlife habitats, absorb atmospheric carbon and strengthen the resilience of communities against environmental change.

However, meaningful progress requires more than saving trees or planting saplings. Restoring nature means rebuilding the complex relationships that allow ecosystems to thrive. It demands a sustained commitment to nurturing young trees, protecting existing forests and ensuring that newly planted trees survive and thrive. Protecting forests, therefore, is about safeguarding the natural systems upon which human life depends.Without careful planning, appropriate species selection and long-term protection, tree-planting initiatives may fail to deliver the environmental benefits they promise.

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), in its State of the World’s Forests 2026 report, places forest and landscape restoration at the heart of global efforts to address biodiversity loss, climate change, food insecurity and environmental degradation. Its central message is clear: meaningful restoration requires coordinated action, sustained investment and approaches that strengthen ecosystems while improving well-being of dependant communities.

According to the report, at least 470 million hectares need to be brought under restoration by 2030 to meet the relevant global targets. Achieving this ambition will require far more than planting millions of seedlings. It demands a landscape-wide approach that restores ecological functions, protects biodiversity, improves soil and water health, and enables forests and surrounding communities to flourish together.

Forest and Landscape Restoration require coordinated action, sustained investment and approaches that benefit both ecosystems and the communities that depend on them.
Forest and Landscape Restoration require coordinated action, sustained investment and approaches that benefit both ecosystems and the communities that depend on them.

Forest and Landscape Restoration: What Is the State of the World’s Forests 2026 Report?

Trees and forests sustain life by providing wildlife habitats, storing carbon, regulating water cycles and supplying resources that communities depend on. They also help people cope with rising temperatures, droughts and other environmental pressures.

However, deforestation, land degradation, wildfires and unsustainable land use continue to undermine these benefits, threatening biodiversity, livelihoods and ecosystem health. Although governments have made ambitious restoration commitments, the central challenge is ensuring that these promises translate into lasting ecological recovery. This challenge lies at the heart of forest and landscape restoration (FLR), the focus of the 2026 edition of The State of the World’s Forests (SOFO), a flagship publication of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

Published biennially, the report examines global forest conditions, emerging challenges and the role of forests in environmental protection, economic development and human well-being. Its focus on restoration highlights the need to move beyond isolated tree-planting initiatives towards approaches that recover ecological functions and deliver lasting benefits for people and nature.

Forest and landscape restoration recognises that forests are interconnected with agricultural land, grasslands, wetlands, rivers and human settlements. Effective restoration must therefore consider entire landscapes, protect existing ecosystems, recover degraded areas and support communities that depend on them.

This requires more than planting trees: it calls for community participation, sustainable financing, effective governance and policies that support long-term management and ecological recovery. The broader argument is that restoration succeeds when environmental goals and human well-being are addressed together.

By connecting local restoration efforts with Sustainable Development Goals, the Paris Agreement and the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, this approach reinforces the importance of protecting forests, restoring degraded landscapes and managing natural resources sustainably. Ultimately, progress should be measured not simply by number of trees planted, but by recovery of ecosystems, protection of biodiversity and the lasting benefits delivered to local communities.

Forest and Landscape Restoration: What Is the State of the World’s Forests 2026 Report?
Forest and Landscape Restoration: What Is the State of the World’s Forests 2026 Report?

Key Findings of the State of the World’s Forests 2026

The report presents a picture of the enormous value of forests alongside the scale of the restoration challenge.

1. Forests Cover Nearly One-Third of the World’s Land: According to the FAO, the world’s forests cover approximately 4.14 billion hectares, equivalent to around 32% of global land area. These ecosystems influence local and global climates, protect watersheds, stabilise soils and provide habitats for wildlife. They also support millions of people through food, fuel, timber, medicinal plants and other forest products. Their importance extends far beyond the boundaries of individual forests. Healthy forests contribute to stability of wider landscapes, including agricultural areas and communities that depend on reliable water supplies.

2. Forests Store Vast Quantities of Carbon: Global forests store approximately 714 gigatonnes of carbon, making them an important component of the Earth’s climate system. Trees absorb carbon dioxide through photosynthesis and store carbon in their trunks, branches, roots and surrounding soils. When forests are cleared, burned or degraded, some of this stored carbon can return to atmosphere. Protecting existing forests is therefore essential to climate action. Restoration can provide additional benefits, but newly planted trees cannot immediately replace the carbon stocks, biodiversity or ecological complexity of mature natural forests.

3. Land Degradation Is a Global Concern: The FAO estimates that approximately 1.56 billion hectares of land are degraded worldwide, including more than 460 million hectares of degraded forest land. Land degradation can result from deforestation, unsustainable agriculture, erosion, pollution, infrastructure development and climate-related pressures. As soil loses fertility and vegetation disappears, landscapes become less capable of retaining water, supporting wildlife and sustaining agricultural production. The consequences can include declining biodiversity, reduced livelihood opportunities and greater vulnerability to droughts and other environmental stresses.

4. Global Restoration Commitments Exceed One Billion Hectares: Countries and international initiatives have pledged to bring more than one billion hectares of land under restoration. However, commitments and actual implementation are not the same. According to the FAO, at least 470 million hectares must be brought under restoration by 2030 to meet relevant global restoration targets. This gap highlights the need to translate political promises into practical programmes supported by adequate funding, scientific planning, local participation and long-term monitoring. Restoration must also be designed for the particular ecosystem involved. A tropical rainforest, mountain forest, dryland woodland and coastal mangrove cannot all be restored through the same methods.

5. Restoration Can Deliver Economic and Environmental Benefits: Forest and landscape restoration can improve soil health, protect water resources, strengthen biodiversity and support rural livelihoods. The FAO identifies restoration as a potentially cost-effective investment in resilient food systems and sustainable development. However, financial returns depend on local conditions, restoration methods, time horizons and the benefits being measured. Its value should not be judged solely in financial terms. Cleaner water, healthier soils, wildlife recovery and more resilient communities are also important outcomes.

What Is Forest and Landscape Restoration?

Forest and landscape restoration is the process of recovering degraded forests and other landscapes while improving biodiversity, ecosystem functions and human well-being. Unlike conventional afforestation, which focuses primarily on establishing trees in areas where they were previously absent, landscape restoration considers the ecological and social relationships connecting different types of land. Depending on local conditions, restoration may involve:

– Protecting existing natural forests from further degradation.
– Encouraging the natural regeneration of native vegetation.
– Rehabilitating degraded forests and damaged soils.
– Restoring wetlands, riverbanks and watersheds.
– Integrating trees into farms through agroforestry.
– Improving grazing practices and restoring degraded grasslands.
– Reconnecting fragmented habitats to support wildlife movement.
– Working with local communities to develop sustainable land-use practices.

The objective is not simply to make a landscape appear greener. It is to recover the processes that enable ecosystems to function, adapt and support life over time.

Unlike conventional afforestation, which focuses primarily on establishing trees in areas where they were previously absent, landscape restoration considers the ecological and social relationships connecting different types of land.
Unlike conventional afforestation, which focuses primarily on establishing trees in areas where they were previously absent, landscape restoration considers the ecological and social relationships connecting different types of land.

India’s Progress in Forest and Landscape Restoration

India provides an important example of the scale at which restoration programmes can operate. The figures cited in reporting on the FAO’s 2026 assessment indicate that India ranks first in reported area under active forest restoration in the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2025, with approximately 9.8 million hectares. China follows with about 7.9 million hectares and Ethiopia with approximately 5 million hectares.

These figures should be interpreted in the context of the reporting methods and definitions used to measure restoration. The area reported as being under restoration does not necessarily represent land where ecological recovery is complete.

India’s seventh national report under the Convention on Biological Diversity also reports approximately 18.9 million hectares of forest and landscape areas under restoration, placing the country second after China under the comparison cited in the report material. Afforestation, agroforestry and community-based forest management are among the approaches used to support restoration and improve land productivity.

Nevertheless, increasing tree cover is not automatically equivalent to restoring a healthy forest. A plantation dominated by a single species may provide some benefits, but it generally cannot reproduce all the ecological relationships, habitat diversity and resilience of a naturally regenerated forest.

India’s long-term progress will depend not only on how much land is covered by trees, but also on the survival of native species, the condition of forest soils, biodiversity recovery and the protection of existing natural ecosystems.

Major Challenges in Forest Restoration

Despite growing international commitments, several obstacles continue to limit restoration efforts.

1. Focusing on Tree Numbers Instead of Ecological Recovery: Planting campaigns often measure success through the number of seedlings distributed or the area planted. These indicators are useful, but they do not reveal whether trees survive, native wildlife returns or soil and water conditions improve. A successful restoration programme must monitor outcomes over several years rather than ending its assessment when planting is complete.

2. Inadequate Long-Term Funding: Restoration involves much more than purchasing seedlings. Land preparation, site protection, maintenance, monitoring and community engagement all require resources. Without sustained financial support, young trees may die, restored habitats may deteriorate and initial investments may fail to deliver lasting benefits.

3. Climate-Related Risks: Rising temperatures, droughts, wildfires, pests, diseases and extreme weather can undermine restoration projects. Species selection must reflect local climate, soil conditions and future environmental risks. Planting trees that cannot survive the conditions of a particular landscape may waste resources and damage restoration efforts.

4. Unclear Land Rights and Limited Community Participation: Local and Indigenous communities often possess valuable knowledge about native species, seasonal changes, water resources and traditional land management. However, restoration programmes can struggle when land tenure is uncertain or communities are excluded from decision-making. People are more likely to protect restored landscapes when their rights, livelihoods and knowledge are respected.

5. Conflicting Development Policies: Forest restoration cannot succeed in isolation from other development decisions. Agricultural expansion, poorly planned infrastructure, destructive resource extraction and policies that encourage environmental degradation can undermine restoration investments. Governments must coordinate forestry, agriculture, infrastructure, climate and biodiversity policies to ensure that progress in one sector is not cancelled out by damage in another.

Recommendations from the FAO’s 2026 Report

The report highlights four interconnected pathways for expanding effective forest and landscape restoration.

1. Empower People and Strengthen Rights: Governments should involve local communities and Indigenous Peoples in restoration planning, implementation and monitoring. Their knowledge and priorities should influence decisions about land use, species selection and the management of restored ecosystems. Where applicable, Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) should be respected. Community participation is not merely a means of obtaining labour. It is an essential foundation for fair and lasting restoration.

2. Adopt Landscape-Based Planning: Restoration strategies should reflect the needs of entire landscapes rather than focusing on isolated planting sites. For example, restoring a riverbank may require controlling erosion, protecting upstream vegetation, improving agricultural practices and reducing pollution. Similarly, restoring a dryland landscape may depend on water conservation, native shrubs, sustainable grazing and natural regeneration. An integrated approach helps ensure that restoration benefits biodiversity, soil, water and livelihoods together.

3. Mobilise Finance and Support Sustainable Businesses: Governments, development institutions and responsible private investors should support restoration programmes through long-term funding and suitable financial mechanisms. Sustainable forest products, agroforestry and other nature-positive businesses can create income while reducing pressure on ecosystems. Financial support should be designed around measurable ecological and social outcomes, not simply the amount of land planted.

4. Improve Policies, Institutions and Monitoring: Clear laws, effective institutions and coordinated policies are necessary to protect restored landscapes. Satellite imagery, geographic information systems, field surveys and community observations can help assess changes in forest cover, biodiversity, soil conditions and carbon storage. Monitoring should also distinguish between plantations, naturally regenerating forests and degraded areas undergoing recovery. This makes it easier to understand what is working and where corrective action is needed.

Why Forest Restoration Matters for Our Future

Healthy forests support life in ways that are often invisible until they begin to disappear.

Climate resilience: Forests absorb and store carbon and can help landscapes adapt to changing environmental conditions.

Biodiversity conservation: Natural and restored habitats provide food, shelter and breeding grounds for countless species.

Soil protection: Tree roots and ground vegetation can reduce erosion and help maintain soil structure.

Water security: Forests influence rainfall interception, infiltration, runoff and watershed conditions. Their effects depend on local ecosystems and management practices.

Disaster risk reduction: Well-managed vegetation and landscapes can reduce certain risks associated with erosion, landslides and flooding, although forests alone cannot prevent every disaster.

Rural livelihoods: Agroforestry and sustainably managed forest products can support employment, food security and household income.

Human well-being: Accessible green spaces and healthy natural landscapes can support recreation, mental restoration and stronger connections between people and nature. These benefits demonstrate why forest restoration should be treated as an investment in environmental security and human well-being rather than merely a tree-planting exercise.

What Forest Restoration Means for Pakistan

The lessons of the State of the World’s Forests 2026 are particularly relevant to Pakistan, where forests, river systems, mountain ecosystems and agricultural landscapes face pressure from climate change, land degradation and unsustainable resource use.

In the Swat Valley, for example, the health of mountain forests is closely connected with rivers, springs, agricultural land and settlements. Damage to vegetation, riverbank degradation and poorly managed development is affecting the wider landscape.

Restoration efforts should therefore prioritise protecting existing natural forests, encouraging native vegetation, conserving watersheds and preventing further degradation. Riverbanks and stream corridors also deserve attention because they provide habitat, help stabilise soil and connect different parts of the landscape.

Plantation campaigns can contribute to these objectives, but their success depends on suitable species, proper planting seasons, protection from grazing and cutting, and follow-up care. Local communities, schools, civil society organisations and government departments can work together to monitor tree survival, report illegal clearing and identify degraded areas suitable for restoration. Most importantly, restoration should not become a substitute for protecting what remains. Preventing the destruction of a mature natural forest is often more effective than attempting to recreate its ecological complexity after it has been lost.

The Way Forward: Restore Nature, Not Just Tree Cover

The world does not lack restoration promises. It needs consistent action that turns those promises into functioning ecosystems. Governments must protect existing forests, direct resources towards the landscapes most in need of recovery and support restoration methods suited to local ecological conditions. Communities should have a meaningful role in decisions that affect their land and livelihoods, while scientific monitoring should measure long-term outcomes.

Businesses and investors also have a responsibility to ensure that their activities do not undermine the ecosystems they depend on. Meanwhile, citizens can contribute by caring for planted trees, protecting native vegetation, reducing waste and supporting responsible environmental initiatives.

The most important measure of success is not how many seedlings are placed in the ground during a campaign. It is how many survive, how well the surrounding ecosystem recovers and whether the restored landscape continues to support life for future generations.

Conclusion

The State of the World’s Forests 2026 report highlights both the promise of global restoration efforts and the enormous work still required to meet 2030 targets. With at least 470 million hectares needing to be brought under restoration, the challenge demands stronger cooperation, sustained financing, inclusive governance and effective monitoring. India’s reported progress illustrates the scale of restoration that national programmes can achieve. Yet the wider lesson applies to every country: expanding tree cover must go hand in hand with protecting natural forests, recovering biodiversity and strengthening ecological resilience.

A forest is not simply a collection of trees. It is a living network that connects soil, water, wildlife, climate and people. Restoring that network means giving nature the conditions it needs to recover. If we want a greener and safer future, we must look beyond the number of trees planted and ask a more meaningful question: Are we restoring living systems that make our planet habitable? That is real promise of forest and landscape restoration – a responsibility we cannot afford to postpone.

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), The State of the World’s Forests 2026: Restoring forests and landscapes—the way forward for a sustainable future. Read the “official FAO report and resources” (https://www.fao.org/publications/fao-flagship-publications/the-state-of-the-worlds-forests/en).